I have a constructed a quasi question that some perspective on the actual exam questions.
Note: This exam question was constructed by myself and not from the real exam
Lets take a quick look at IEEE wireless standards for example. They come in 4 forms (802.11, 802.11b, 802.11a and 802.11n) with different frequencies and transfer rates.
You may learn the types, though you will get a lengthy question that looks something like this:
A company are currently using the legacy IEEE 802.11 standard for their internal wireless communications. They are facing issues regarding wireless interference because they are testing electronic kitchen appliances in their factory. The company wishes to benefit from a faster rate of transfer without jeopardising the range of transfer. From the following, which wireless communications standards would you recommend for the small company to implement?
- a. 802.11n or 802.11x
b. 802.11n or 802.11a
b. 802.11n or 802.11b
d. 802.11n or 802.11g
Questions like these are the reason why this exam are so painful. You may know bit rate and the frequencies along with the order of which wireless connection came first, though whats the actual answer? To master the CISSP questions, you need to know the technical understanding though able to answer it from a managerial perspective. You need to make the decision rather than pointing at the explicit answer to the question.
In Soccer terms, this is like saying,
- 'who's the best footballer at the moment' (Messi)
- 'from the following, who's the best footballer at the moment
- Emile Heskey (NewCastle Jets)
- Titus Bramble (Sunderland)
- Stewart Downing (Liverpool)
- David Hoilett (QPR)
A hard choice here (between all four of them because there're all as mind-numbing to watch), though if I was in the CISSP exam and I was to guess, I would say Bramble.
OK back to the exam and lets start eliminating. First you should be aware that 802.11x is actually the 'family' of IEEE wireless standards, it's not an actual wireless standard, so 'A' is eliminated. Wireless standards has increased over the ages, so has the ability to transmit over longer distances and faster rates. with this in mind, all the possibilities have greater distances than 802.11 therefore all can achieve this requirement.
The biggest pain point here is the interference. It's because 802.11 which runs @ 2.4Ghz wireless frequency, which is also the same frequency of 'kitchen appliances' such as microwaves.
If you know the story behind the wireless connections, 802.11b actually came out before 802.11a. 802.11a came out for the sole reason because of interference issues. As a result, it came out with a different frequency (5Ghz).
Just FYI, the 802.11n IEEE standard comes with the option of 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz
Considering that the interferences are the issue as the major concern and neglecting the other aspects, I would select b. 802.11n and 802.11a.
About the author
Daniel is a Technical Manager with over 10 years of consulting expertise in the Identity and Access Management space.Daniel has built from scratch this blog as well as technicalconfessions.com
Follow Daniel on twitter @nervouswiggles
Comments
Other Posts
AS I was migrating my environment into an S3 environment, I wanted to leverage off the SES services that AWS provide, more specifically, to leverage the off the SMTP functionality by sending an email via PHP
Read More...
The WeMos D1 is a ESP8266 WiFi based board is an extension to the current out-of-the-box library that comes with the Arduino installation. Because of this, you need to import in the libraries as well as acknowledging the specific board. This process is highly confusion with a number of different individuals talking about a number of different ways to integrate.
Read More...
NameID element must be present as part of the Subject in the Response message, please enable it in the IDP configuration.
Read More...
For what I see, there's not too many supportive documentations out there that will demonstrate how provision AD group membership with the ICF connector using OpenIDM. The use of the special ldapGroups attribute is not explained anywhere in the Integrators guides to to the date of this blog. This quick blog identifies the tasks required to provision AD group membership from OpenIDM to AD using the LDAP ICF connector. However this doesn't really explain what ldapGroups actually does and there's no real worked example of how to go from an Assignment to ldapGroups to an assigned group in AD. I wrote up a wiki article for my own reference: AD group memberships automatically to users This is just my view, others may disagree, but I think the implementation experience could be improved with some more documentation and a more detailed example here.
Read More...
In the past, the similar error occurred though for the Oracle Identity Management solution. invalidcredentialexception remote framework key is invalid Because they all share the ICF connector framework, the error/solution would be the same.
Read More...
org.forgerock.script.exception.ScriptCompilationException: missing ; before statement
Read More...
ForgeRock IDM - org.forgerock.script.exception.ScriptCompilationException: missing ; before statement
Read More...
When performing the attempt of a reconciliation from ForgeRock IDM to Active Directory, I would get the following error
Read More...
In the past, the similar error occurred though for the Oracle Identity Management solution. invalidcredentialexception remote framework key is invalid Because they all share the ICF connector framework, the error/solution would be the same.
Read More...
During the reconcilation from OpenIDM to the ICF google apps connector, the following error response would occur. ERROR Caused by com.google.api.client.auth.oauth2.TokenResponseException 400 Bad Request - invalid_grant
Read More...